GLOBALIZATION: TAKING TOLLS ON RELATIONSHIPS?
While globalization has turned this present world into a ‘la
la land’ where the ‘la las’ lie in the sweep of our bourgeoist ideals, it would
also be quite safe to say that globalization also has its deterrences. Globalization
has pushed the indigenous and the aboriginal businesses into a quagmire of
varied problems and have made the ‘happy’ countries even more happier. And the
‘happy ’people living in those ’happy’ countries almost beatific. But at large,
it also resonates its so called unhealthy vibrations in our family and
community life.
Globalization does not beget global citizenship
instinctually. While education is the driving tool for promoting global
citizenship for all, one should not ignore the weak and the poor whose lives
have basically been tarnished by a series of impediments in their work culture,
brought about by this newly found enchantment of the privileged to now feed
themselves what they want, rather than what they actually and should need. The
economy should not only lie within the purview of being catered by global
citizens, but also should be a facet which is within the embrace of every
future child.
According to
a report, the following are one of the most contentious changes that are
affecting family and community life, typically in the Asian countries:
1. There has been an augmentation in the
size of migrant workers and are now estimated to occupy now more that 3% of the
world’s population. Many of these have been forced to migrate because of an
economic compulsion. They often have fewer rights, lower standards of medical
care and less legal protection and sometimes are objected to such social
prejudices that are outright breaches of the International Human Rights Law.
Family members who are separated for seeking work in the outside cities and
towns, often have inevitable strained relationships.
2. There has been a shoot up in the
figures of International and cross-border marriages. And globalization has
expedited the rise in the ‘bride trade’ followed by its associated abuses.
3. In many countries, there is a
capacious gap between the rich and the poor.
Global powers such as the United States of America have
exacerbated the plunder, underemployment and poverty of poorer countries in
Asia and Africa, by vitiating the importance of goods produced by local businessmen
and initiating this quotidian shtick of people cribbing over not being able to
buy an attire which has an ‘Armani’ label stitched to it. Sad, really.
People who are forced to migrate so as to look for new jobs and
opportunities, are also forced to separate from their loved ones, friends and
families. They are never able to seek succour in those times and this further
leads to broken families and homes. The new atmosphere which they are
confronted to often leads to them conforming to those ethics, manners, cultures
and lifestyle. For people, especially who belong from the antediluvian lands of
their countries, when exposed to such avaricious and brand conscious culture,”
take their compatriots as of ‘lower standing.’”
Children who are left by their parents, in their home countries
are the most susceptible to an adverse social impact as since they do not
really live and grow up their parents, their family values and sense of
belonging are usually evanesced. They start believing as there is nobody who is
truly theirs, and separation from their parents often breeds low grades in
school and social vices such as alcohol consumption, drug abuse, etc. at a very
young age.
Japan is the concourse of foreign trainees. Although the Japanese
government realizes that they need
foreign trainees for economic development, they fail to implement laws for
their security and protection. In fact, many male and female migrants in Japan are
working in places associate with debauchery, which are shunned by the Japanese
people, typically the younger generation. Nevertheless, “as more and more
migrants are residing in Japan and forming relationships (with people from
their own country), it has been seen that undocumented workers’ children, and
those who are not legitimized by their fathers, have to face problems in being
registered with the local government because of their parents’ fear of
deportation. Thus, these children are regarded as illegal residents and live
under constant stress and many have nowhere to stay or go to school.”
In Singapore, many people, especially men are moving overseas
without their families. The sole responsibility of parenting is stressed upon
the spouse- in most cases, the wife. Even though now many women have been
employed in high paying jobs in Singapore, the immutable ideology that men
should be the one to work abroad and their wives to be working full-time at
their respective jobs, taking care after the their children and the aged
parents. The frequent absence of the father results in children not being able
to bond well with their father and an inevitable feeling of not even having a
father figure in their lives in the first place. The same principle could be implied
to cross-border marriages proliferating in the Hong-Kong and China region,
where the children live with one parent in Hong-Kong and one parent has to work
in mainland China. In a worst case scenario, both the parents stay in Mainland,
and the child would be taken care of by the grandparents.” The absence of
parent in the family presents an insecure environment for the children, who
consequently suffer because of inadequate care. In 2007, there had been a
number of incidents where children of Mainland/Hong Kong cross-border marriages
were lost or injured through accidents when they were left alone.”
Even families who maintain communication, due to absence of
quality time and family transition, lose important contacts over time.
Adding to the aforementioned, many youngsters are getting married
at a later age or deciding to remain bachelors or spinsters for a protracted
time period. And the stress from the high cost of living, coupled with stress
at work are factors which reason out why many married couples do not want to
have children at an earlier stage of their marriage.
Globalisation has also emanated a trend of spendthrift youth, in
contrast to their parsimonious ancestors.
To cite one of the most prevalent family issues relating to
globalization is that many children today are denigrating their families’
cultural values at the cost of new trends that have been propagating in the
society today through the internet and social media websites. Youngsters find
subsuming themselves in video gaming for hours and hours, posting their
snapchat stories sporadically, ‘celebrating’ “Mothers’/Fathers’ Day” with their
mother or father just for the sake of taking one good picture and writing that
one huge post Facebook boasting their broadened lexicon of English indicating
the synonyms they know of love, watching YouTube videos for a long time, going
out to party just to take a hit of that hukkah, being dogmatic in their
approach when it comes to prevailing social issues but denouncing every aspect
of their own religion, is at pareil of spending quality time with the ones who
brought them into this world, for them. All love, internet. Seriously. All
love.
Thus it is of cardinal importance to promote a global
consciousness about families that involves public and personal concern about
the effects of globalization on relationships.
Till then,
Happy family time!
No comments:
Post a Comment